1984 – A reality in Shenzhen


Americans today tend to believe that Apple as a corporation is infallible. We associate the technologies that Apple has created with religion –embodying a cult following. Apple enthusiasts describe the way its products feel, look, and make you feel. In this way, Apple is able to create something more than just technology. Apple products inspire a new way of life. How else can you explain the extreme popularity of the iPhone, iMac, and iPad? Steve Jobs and Apple were able to design products that consumers dreamt of while ignoring the results of market research. In doing so, it’s not surprising that Apple cut corners and incorporated unethical business practices. As Mike Daisey prefaced his story, it’s easy to let innovation, design, and elegance clout the consumer’s vision of Apple. There’s another side to the story and that’s Fox Conn. Daisey was able to experience first hand the poor treatment of Chinese workers in plants that directly supplied Apple and various other electronic companies.

 

Before listening to Daisey’s story my initial impression of Fox Conn was of naivety. I knew what Fox Conn was and had various foggy memories of news stories that surfaced regarding the poor working conditions of its employees. I went in with a mindset that conditions in outsourced factories are grim but play a key role in providing economic activity to the area and are successful in providing “livable” conditions to their workers. However, after listening to Daisey’s story, I’m disturbed by the extremity of poor working conditions. Daisey mentions the construction of nets to prevent suicides, cafeterias that serve 10,000 and sit 4,000 people, and sleeping conditions that better resemble coffins than beds. In addition to material and mental components of the working conditions at Fox Conn he also depicts images of serious physical damage to the bodies of workers. The poisonous screen cleaners bothered me in addition to the tremendous wear and tear on workers’ joints. Everything that Mike Daisey described appeared to be lack luster attempts by the corporate office to reduce costs and improve efficiency. The question is where to draw the line?

 

Given the history of Apple’s success it’s not surprising to me that they have a few skeletons in their closet. Throughout Apple’s life they faced constant pressure to improve production efficiencies at reduced costs. In the period of explosive iPhone and iPad sales it was a business necessity for Apple to provide sufficient supply of its products to curb demand. If I had to guess, the working conditions at Fox Conn were arguably better in the earlier stages of its life and as demand and pressures to reduce costs increased, the working conditions suffered. Apple is also notorious for consistently beating its earnings reports. It would not surprise me if special treatment was given to Fox Conn (or other suppliers) to decrease costs in order to satisfy market pressures. Lastly, I find it ironic that Apple depicts itself as the savior from a dystopian 1984 society when in reality; Apple is the direct cause of a similar culture in its factories abroad. I believe that we (corporations, consumers, and members of society) have an obligation to treat workers the way we believe we should be treated. Workers deserve basic labor protections even when the jobs are being outsourced.1984_ditadura

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “1984 – A reality in Shenzhen

  1. We definitely have seen some of those followers of this Apple cult in our everyday lives who find nothing wrong with Apple, and Mike Daisey was one of them before finding out about the happenings over at Foxconn. But now that I’ve read some of the other articles about Apple and Steve Jobs, it doesn’t even surprise me as much that Apple is okay with hiding away some of these issues simply to make a small increase in profit. I like your idea of how Foxconn was probably better with meeting standards in its early days, and I think that’s the idea that most of these businesses start out with – but once a company, such as Apple, keeps getting bigger and bigger with more profits and a high stock price, that idea that you need to promote safety for workers in another country that you’ll never see in your life takes a backseat.

    Like

  2. Similar to you, I think everyone has at some point or another in their educations learnt about sweatshops and the bad conditions that workers have to endure. However it’s kind of interesting to me to see how the conversations are being had to inform individuals but not to propose solutions to the ongoing problem. Is it just a result of capitalistic societies? I think you make a good point that Apple is constantly facing pressures to produce at low costs, but I remember learning about relatively low costs of production and high pricing of Apple products so I wonder if there’s anything that Apple could do, and more importantly, would do, in order to help the harsh conditions at factories such as Shenzhen.

    Like

  3. Ryan, first let me say I really liked your thoughts on the issue. I completely agree with the points you make about Fox Conn acting in response to added pressure to create higher margins. I hadn’t thought about the idea that they had originally been a much better place to work, however, the promise of vast riches and a seemingly endless flow of business was too tempting. While conditions prior to Apple’s business were probably not up to standards, they most certainly deteriorated after Apple became one of their biggest clients. The question that I have based on this, is Apple really to blame here or does the blame fall on the consumer? After all, we are the reason that Apple creates products to sell. Perhaps at first, their motive was to advance society but at some point it turned into maximising the bottom line. A similar case may be whether you blame a drug dealer for advertising and selling you drugs or do you blame yourself for taking them. Similar to the case with Apple, the feeling provided is one likened to euphoria, however in both cases, the user is unaware of the negative conditions that they place themselves and others in. So the question really is, who is to blame?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s